<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Earth and Moon Seen from Mars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wanderingspace.net/2008/03/earth-and-moon-seen-from-mars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wanderingspace.net/2008/03/earth-and-moon-seen-from-mars/</link>
	<description>Imaging the bodies of our Solar Sysytem</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://wanderingspace.net/2008/03/earth-and-moon-seen-from-mars/#comment-1544</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wanderingspace.net/?p=731#comment-1544</guid>
		<description>it is really just the idea that a small probe orbiting another planet which was designed to take images of a place much closer to it can see something so far away with such clarity. i suppose you are right, if i were in orbit around mars with a telescope in hand… it would be no surprise to see such a vision through the eye-piece of even a mediocre instrument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is really just the idea that a small probe orbiting another planet which was designed to take images of a place much closer to it can see something so far away with such clarity. i suppose you are right, if i were in orbit around mars with a telescope in hand… it would be no surprise to see such a vision through the eye-piece of even a mediocre instrument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordan</title>
		<link>http://wanderingspace.net/2008/03/earth-and-moon-seen-from-mars/#comment-1543</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wanderingspace.net/?p=731#comment-1543</guid>
		<description>We've seen similar shots of Mars taken from amateur telescopes here on Earth, why would it be hard to imagine a telescope at Mars, without atmospheric blurring, could produce a similar result?

I'm puzzled by this reaction, it's as though people imagine Mars-to-Earth distance is somehow larger than Earth-to-Mars distance? I think that might be just the "That's us!" factor that plays with one's sense of perspective and distance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve seen similar shots of Mars taken from amateur telescopes here on Earth, why would it be hard to imagine a telescope at Mars, without atmospheric blurring, could produce a similar result?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m puzzled by this reaction, it&#8217;s as though people imagine Mars-to-Earth distance is somehow larger than Earth-to-Mars distance? I think that might be just the &#8220;That&#8217;s us!&#8221; factor that plays with one&#8217;s sense of perspective and distance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

